Posts Tagged ‘New York Times’

Be Nice to the Mice

Monday, January 4th, 2010

The end of the year, the decade, passed fitfully, at times stressfully, with no pause for reflection, and no Resolution for the New Year except the fairly vague intention of being more Resolute. What to be resolute about? That was still the question.

And then this article by Errol Morris in the New York Times came across the network this morning, the hook being a quote from Walt Disney (”I only hope that we don’t lose sight of one thing — that It Was All Started By A Mouse.“) as its headline. I’d already seen the link a couple of times when Howard Green from Disney Studios called to invite me to a tribute for Walt’s recently-departed nephew, Roy Disney, on Sunday at the El Capitan Theatre in Hollywood.   Suddenly the universe was in my ear bigtime, whispering that I had to click on the link to the Morris article. Something was there to be discovered….

The article itself is a photo essay and dialogue with photojournalist Ben Curtis about the forensics of war photography, the context of image vs. imagemaker, the technological challenges and dangers that come with altering photos to create propaganda or enhance a certain point of view. The kind of stuff in which Morris specializes. After I got the context, I began skimming. But I kept coming back to a photo by Curtis that led off the article:MMWarPhoto1

In seeing the photo, I found what had been missing over the holidays. I might have decided to be resolute, I was still waffling on a theme, what, exactly I’d be resolute about. This photo resolved that. I wrote the following Comment on the Morris piece:

Errol

As our old friend Onosko, who worked at the House of Mouse for many years, might have said, you’re making it more complicated than it is. Focusing on the cosmetic level of communication–the toy itself, the shards of glass, the smoke, the interaction between imagemaker and image–is a fascinating narrative, and yields neverending complexity, but this complexity obscures meaning instead of bringing it to light. How Mickey got there is not nearly as important as the meta and emotional levels of the communication: War’s awfulest tragedies are its children.

Until we begin thinking of children first–begin with the Mice!, that what Walt would’ve done–War will be an adult theme park where children get crippled, grow old and perish before their time.

And so, finally, thanks to Howard and Errol and Ben, I have it — my New Year’s theme — the thing I can be Resolute about:  Be Nice to the Mice.

Hit it, Kid!

BabyDrummer1

The Darwin-win Game

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

David Brooks’ piece in today’s NY Times talks about the protocol (as in software instructions) as being the most valuable asset in the Networked World economy. He writes things like:

The success of an economy depends on its ability to invent and embrace new protocols.

and

Protocols are intangible, so the traits needed to invent and absorb them are intangible, too.

and sums up with

When the economy was about stuff, economics resembled physics. When it’s about ideas, economics comes to resemble psychology.

My comment:

There is a technique for cultures to absorb new protocols. It’s called improvisation. The fundamentals of its practice were developed in the 1930s by a couple of schoolteachers in Chicago, Neva Boyd and Viola Spolin, whose objective was to create a way for children from diverse cultural backgrounds to collaborate productively (sounds like today’s economy, doesn’t it?). The underlying construct is ‘the game,’ which is defined by rules, roles, environment and objectives. The game transcends the cosmetic boundaries of language and culture to create the shared focus that is essential to progress.

Organizationally, economically, linguistically, and even biologically, it is the ability to improvise — to continuously adapt by making pragmatic and productive choices in a changing environment — that allows any culture to evolve. For the past two hundred years, no nation’s culture has been better at improvising than America’s, and more than anything else, it is our ability to improvise that is being tested today. As Charles Darwin said, “It is not the strongest species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the ones most responsive to change.”

Poster for The Origin of Species, a play with music written by Lizzie Mitchell that debuted at the 2009 Edinburgh Fringe Fest

Poster for The Origin of Species, a play with music written by Lizzie Mitchell that debuted at the 2009 Edinburgh Fringe Fest

Understatement of the Week

Friday, January 16th, 2009

“The operation was not without improvisation.”

USAirways1

Michael Wilson and Al Baker, writing in today’s New York Times about yesterday’s ‘Miracle on the Hudson.’

GameChanger of the Month, February 2008

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

When I began my career in the media business, it was accepted as doctrine that if you had a mainstream news story, the New York Times or one of the big Manhattan-based publications led, and everyone else followed. This began changing with the advent of the Networked World, until it seemed that no one was leading and everyone was following, that the news came from everywhere, all at once. (A classic improv saying goes: “Follow the follower.”) No one understood these new realities better and faster than Matt Drudge.

Drudge1

After Drudge (’Web A. D.’ ) the constellation that was American newspaper journalism, shook, shifted and re-aligned, with Himself as one of its stars, and other web sites like the Huffington Post, Politico and Gawker joining the Drudge Report as new centers of gravity. (more…)

Old Song, New Song

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

The business section of last Sunday’s New York Times featured an article by Janet Morrissey about various big name musicians monetizing their IP (Intellectual Property) by selling off rights to marketers, and making what have become known as ‘360 deals’. Madonna departing Warner Bros. Music, her record label of 25 years, to make such a deal with Live Nation for live concerts, TV, online media, merch, etc. etc. epitomizes this trend. This is happening as a reaction by the traditional music trade to its woeful recent performance in the traditional channels. Three observations about this article when viewed through the lens of improvisation: (more…)

Butchers in Crazy Town

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007

Thomas Krugman, in a trenchant analysis in yesterday’s New York Times of the sub-prime mortgage mess and the still-to-be-accounted-for hurt hidden in SIVs (Structured Investment Vehicles), compared investors in sub-prime heavy hedge funds to buyers of un-inspected meat. And that’s just about all the information you need to understand why people are getting sick over this. Oh, so the investment banks are great big unregulated meat processors who chop up mortgage tranches and sell off their parts without anyone really knowing what’s in those parts? Now I get it. The more esoteric aspects of hedge funds may escape some of us, but who doesn’t understand bad meat?

Rocky versus Meat
SIVs: Bad Meat
From a GameChangers perspective, three issues led to a series of bad scenes and a disastrous sub-prime performance:

The sub-prime scenes involved a win-lose game. Improvisation is a means for all the players in a scene to achieve the objective. In this instance, as in many business scenes, the objective was to make money, which is all well and good. The game played by the culprit banks was, however, designed for themselves and their cronies to make money at the expense of unwary investors and homeowners. Furthermore, the broader business audience loses too, because even those of us who aren’t heavy into SIVs have to experience the tales of woe that comprise the narrative. By contrast, improvised scenes, when well-played, are win-win.

The players’ intentions were obscure
. The way improvised scenes work, the intentions of the players in the scene are made clearly known to the audience. The game itself may be obscure, or even invisible, but the characters’ intentions are not. For example, in an improv theater scene, a butcher and a housewife may be discussing a cut of meat, while their intention is a seduction of some sort. The audience can see this. Understand it. It’s what the scene is about. In the sub-prime performance, it may have appeared to the houswife and the audience that the intention of the butcher was seduction. It was not. The intention was to conceal the hoof, hair and horn in the meat. Concealment leads to a very unsatisfying scene.

Scenes were built on fantasy. Well-improvised scenes are built on realities agreed to by the players that are believable to the audience. If, in the improv theater scene described above, the butcher begins ascribing magic powers to the cut of meat — that it will enable the housewife to fly, for example — the scene veers into fantasy. It’s not about anything real or human. One of my improv teachers at the I. O. West Theater, Michael Bertrando, calls this ‘going to Crazy Town’. The sub-prime scenes dealt in the fantasies of a housing market that would never cool, less-than-qualified home buyers who would be able to make balloon payments, and dream homes that blinded those buyers to their economic realities. The butchers, in effect, went to Crazy Town, and the housewives are just now discovering that they cannot fly.

Today, a few players are backstage toasting each other with bottles of 1995 Clos du Mesril, feeling like they nailed their performance and the audience is out on the sidewalk screaming for its money back