Posts Tagged ‘Journalism’

The Hurricane with a Thousand Faces

Sunday, August 28th, 2011

I wasn’t going to write a blog post this morning, I have too much to do, flying to San Francisco later today for a workshop at Art.com with the miracle who is Ivy Ross and a small group of artists and storytellers from her amazing constellation of friends.

Then, as I was scanning my network, a pattern became too obvious to ignore:

Television news missed most of the Hurricane Irene story. Social networks did not. This may be the most visible, tightest-framed example I’ve ever seen of how narratives live differently, more dynamically, in networks than they do in the old inside-out media channels. And why improvisation trumps scripting.

From Wednesday on, the mainstream media beat the drum for a monolithic, fear-based narrative about Hurricane Irene. Don’t get me wrong. Precaution is good, and often necessary. “Worry,” William Inge said, “is the interest paid on trouble before it comes due.” The problem for the scripters of TV News is that this is the only narrative they had, and it became increasingly and visibly detached from most of the storm’s reality.

By Friday, CNN’s Wolf ‘Cry’ Blitzer was bouncing from correspondent to correspondent in search of bad news, and you could sense their desperation at not finding any. They were showing B-roll that could have been any Friday afternoon Raleigh-Durham traffic jam in the rain, and characterizing it as a panicking populace fleeing to higher ground. Politicians, camera whores that they are, played dutifully along.

By Saturday,  kids were dancing around in their underwear behind your intrepid TV c0rrespondents who were doing their best to file Admiral Byrd’s dying words even as the dancing kids spoofed their phony narrative. IreneStreaker1

Social and local networks, by contrast, were generating an entirely different portrait of the storm. It was not a picture of panic, but of ‘yes-anding’ the situation. Of neighbors connecting, and watching out for one another. Of helpful hyperlocal reporting about downed trees and street closures. Of beautiful photography from the beaches as Irene rolled in. Of friends gathering for a drink at their favorite martini bar, and bikers blazing through empty Manhattan streets.

Hurricane Irene Photo by Paige Minimi

Hurricane Irene Photo by Paige Minimi

When we play along with the fear-based narratives–be they our own or anyone else’s–there’s no opportunity, no expansion or growth. Irene is a scary bitch, stay inside, don’t answer a knock at the door, and whatever you do, don’t laugh at her or she will terrorize you like her sister, Katrina, did to New Orleans.

The reality of Irene is that she is a Hurricane With a Thousand Faces, and many of those faces are smiling.  Find yourself a smiling Irene and dance.

The Oakley Coda

Thursday, December 16th, 2010

Back in October, when the 33 Chilean miners emerge from the mine where they have been trapped for 69 days, they are all wearing Oakley sunglasses.  Every journalist covering their emergence comments on it.   Every photo of every rescued miner–and how many impressions is that worldwide?  Billions? Trillions? Chillions?—shows them wearing their Oakleys.  I’ve been following the narrative for a while, and long after the rescue has ended happily, I am still curious how those sunglasses got on those 33 billboards faces for all the world to see.LosMineros_Oakleys

Three weeks ago, I contact a friend, Kurt Kochman, who used to work at Oakley (he’s now the Web Customer Experience Manager for Skechers) who puts me in touch with an executive at Oakley, who puts me in touch with a PR person from Oakley named Diane, who puts me in touch with journalist in Chile named Jonathan Franklin, who Diane says, “Knows the story better than we do.” Hmm. A non-Oakley person who knows the Oakley story better than Oakley does? This is my kind of branding. No wonder I wear Oakleys.

Jonathan Franklin

Jonathan Franklin

The Chilean miners, it turns out, come out of that mine wearing Oakleys because Jonathan Franklin works his way through school in the 1980s by selling sunglasses.  There’s a lot more to it than that, of course, but that is how the thread begins. “I’ve always been a fanatic for sunglasses,” says Franklin when we speak on Skype this week. “When I was in college [at Brown University], I made my living selling sunglasses.  I had a company called All I Wear. We had ten or twelve students covering campuses up and down the East Coast. I’ve also been a street vendor of sunglasses.  Good ones. Vuarnets. Ray Bans. Oakley wasn’t on my radar yet.”

Here is what happens between Jonathan Franklin’s college years and the rescue in Chile that results in the miners wearing Oakleys:

2) Twelve years ago, Franklin moves to Chile where he works as a correspondent for The Guardian. He also freelances all over the Americas for publications like GQ, Esquire and Playboy. He embraces the Chilean culture, loves it there, gets married there, begins raising a family there.

3)  In 2003, five years after the move to Chile, while covering a story in North Carolina for GQ about the World SWAT Championships, meets Erik Poston, a sales rep for Oakley. He and Poston bond over their mutual interest in sunglasses technology. “He took time off from whatever he was doing to talk about the optics in sunglasses,” says Franklin. “Oakleys are great in the deserts or the mountains.”

(We call this mutual interest, or agreement, ‘finding the game.’  It is game that will pay off for its players seven years later.)

4)  When he arrives on the scene of the August mine accident in Copiapo, 800 km east of Santiago where he lives, Franklin is the only print journalist given a ‘rescue pass, which means he has full access to the rescue site, and regular conversations with the miners. His pass designates his job on the rescue site as ‘Writer.’

5) A few weeks after the miners get discovered still alive, Franklin sits in on a meeting at which the subject is the design of the rescue vessel [The Phoenix].  “Talk about improvisation,” he says, “there’s never been anything like this. At one point, they said they’d need sunglasses for the guys. They just kind of skipped right over it, said they’d get safety glasses or something.  They had so many things to think about that they just skipped right over the glasses.  I raised my hand and said, ‘Excuse me, I am only a journalist, and I don’t mean to be butting in, but why don’t you get the guys some Oakleys or some real sunglasses?  And they said we don’t care about that.  And I said how about if I’m in charge of sunglasses?  So they said okay, fine, one less thing for us to worry about, you’re in charge of sunglasses.”

(This is classic ‘yes-anding’ by Franklin.  Yes-anding can move a scene in an unexpectedly productive direction.  It can also, as it does here, transform a trivial detail into something important and valuable.  These little twists are the stuff great stories are made of.)

6) “God knows why, but I had saved the guy from Oakley’s business card. So I write him a letter.   I said I’m a journalist, I’m not going to make a penny off this, but if you get me the glasses, I’ll get them to the miners.”

7) Oakley responds immediately. They ask for specs. The Chilean Navy, which is tending to the miners’ health, sends the specs. Anatomical, so that debris and dirt won’t get in. And dark. 1oo% UV and UVB ratings. Research scientists at Oakley go back and forth with the Navy a few times until they get the best lenses on the most appropriate frames. They ship 35 customized pairs to the Copiapo mine.

The glasses arrive at the last minute. A Navy doctor sends them down the rescue chute. When they come back up, they are on smiling faces surrounded by more smiling faces, and the rest…is eyewear history.

IMG_0523“The Chileans were very grateful,” says Franklin. “The miners, before they were released, were very grateful.  And it was good for everyone.  I know Oakley has gotten criticized for exploiting the situation, but the CEO of Oakley, who sent me the glasses, had totally forgotten about it.  He was watching the rescue on TV, and the first miner pops up and he’s wearing Oakleys, and the CEO says to his wife, ‘How about that, he’s wearing our glasses!’  And the second miner pops up, and he’s wearing Oakleys, and the CEO said, ‘Oh, yeah, that’s right, we sent them some of our glasses!’  He’d totally forgotten about it.”

Lots to be learned from the Oakley Coda:

If you add something productive to every situation you’re in, outcomes take care of themselves.

Subject matter expertise is a good point of connection.

Minor roles in one scene can become major roles in the next scene.

Don’t persuade, participate. The best way to influence the game is by playing it.

Give gifts to your scene partners. Your expertise can be a gift.

Be sensitive to context. If you join a scene in progress, have a good reason why.

Meaningful connections have a long shelf life. This is relevant to network economies, where meaningful connections can be ‘parked’ indefinitely, until a scene calls for them.

Narrative trumps nationality.

Do the good thing in the moment, and the better thing will happen down the line.

Damn, I can’t think of them all! There’s a lot! Find something for yourself in this story and put it in play. Good things will happen as a result. There is a science to serendipity.

You cannot script a story like this. You cannot bake it into your media plan. You cannot buy it, for any price. No one at Oakley could have caused it to happen. If they had tried to achieve the same outcome on their own, it would have come across as rank exploitation. They would’ve never penetrated the inner circle at Copiapo. Instead, they had a conversation. Way back when, they planted a seed. When conditions were right, that seed grew and blossomed into something beautiful, something money could not buy—an incredible narrative.

If you’d like to soak up more of the Chilean miners’ story, you’ll want to pick up the book Jonathan Franklin is writing. It comes out February, 2011.

GameChanger of the Month, October 2009

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

HollywoodElsewhere4Jeffrey Wells came to my attention around five years ago when I was talking with a Hollywood studio publicist about bloggers who were having an impact on entertainment journalism.  The publicist cited a number of names including Wells’, about whom he added, “He scares me a little bit.”

“Why’s that?” I asked, immediately more interested in this Wells dude than in the others the publicist listed.

“You never know what he’s going to write. He can’t be controlled,” the publicist said.

Wow.  Now I was really interested.  A few high profile critics aside, entertainment journalists had been, historically, notorious shills for studios and PR agencies, faithfully adding spin to the narratives they were sold.  This ensured them steady access to the all-important star interviews, along with lots of free meals, expenses-paid junkets, and invitations to review screenings and the occasional gala premiere.

That a player like Wells dared to leave this comfort zone said a couple of things.  First, the guy had to have guts, and confidence in his game.  Second,  entertainment journalism, like all journalism, was changing.  The very fact that my friend, the publicist, was forced to confront his concern about a blogger with a mind of his own was a revolution of sorts.  Very soon after speaking with the publicist, I took a look looked at Jeffrey Wells’ site, Hollywood Elsewhere, for the first time, and haven’t really looked away since.HollywodElsewhere2

Nothing of importance in the film business goes unobserved by Wells.  He is plugged into its zeitgeist.  His well-written commentary, his obvious passion for the cinema, the reliable frequency of his posts, and the broad spectrum of  sources he cites, make Hollywood Elsewhere a singular visit.  The hilariously-neurotic personal experiences he writes about and the commentary by a smart, often-vicious pack of readers are the icing on the cake.

I don’t work in the entertainment business any more, so I don’t need a lot of industry chatter, what I find useful is to get an early heads-up on films that can impact the industry, its key players, the marketplace, and popular culture.  Wells knows how to separate the story from the hype.  While I don’t always agree with his opinions or his perspective, they are always solid.  A reader can triangulate a position, a point of view, from them.

Jeffrey Wells is the GameChanger of the Month for October because he practices fundamentals that journalists and businesspeople in general can use to succeed in any changing business environment:

Cause change.  It is always better to change the game of your own volition than to have your game changed against your will by forces beyond your control.  Wells left the melting icepack of print journalism for the expanding tundra of online media before the people left on the icepack began pushing one another off like they are today.

HollywoodElsewhere3Prepare to struggle. The path to any breakthrough is unpaved.  Gamechanging does not guarantee an easy road to fame and fortune.  It is, rather, a methodical series of steps taken in order to learn, adapt, and discover new avenues for productivity.   Hollywood Elsewhere struggled early.  At one point Wells had to solicit donations from his readers to keep the site alive. It now seems on healthier footing financially, but Wells has a penchant for drama, so you never know what kind of bind he’s getting himself into just so we can all enjoy watching him work his way out of it.

Have a point of view. Wells’ take on the business isn’t the fanboy gush of Ain’t It Cool News, or the studio commissary talk you get from Nikki Finke, it’s uniquely his own.  Visiting HE is like sitting in on conversations about films and current events, and panel discussions with lots of film clips at a neverending film festival with Wells as the lead moderator.  If you dig movies like I do, this is invariably a good experience.

Embrace distributed narratives.  In the networked world, narratives are distributed, never piped down a single channel to their audience.  In addition to the overlapping nature of the conversations between the blogger and his readers, Hollywood Elsewhere’s narratives transpire on multiple media platforms.  They link out to other journalists and web sites.  They also unfold differently over time.  Some of the site’s narratives may consist of a single post; others may continue for a year or more.

In the Networked World,  you cannot control the conversation between brand and audience.  The objective, whether you’re a one-person shop like Hollywood Elsewhere or a behemoth brand like Disney, is to add to the conversation.

Why I’m Bullish on Journalism Majors (and You Should Be, Too)

Monday, August 17th, 2009

In 2006, newspapers took in $49.5 billion in advertising.   In 2008, it was about $38 billion, a 23% decline.

After losing 42% of their value between 2005 and the end of 2007, publicly traded newspaper stocks lost 83% of their remaining value during 2008.

Most surveys show that 13,000+ U.S. newspaper jobs vanished in 2008.

In 2007, 70% of college Communication and Journalism majors had jobs six months after graduation.  In 2008, 60% did.

No doubt about it, the print journalism profession as we’ve known it is fading fast, and its future is as hazy as the crystal ball of a boardwalk fortune teller.

So why put stock in university students who, in these uncertain times, choose to major in Journalism?—as opposed to, say, the point of view expressed in Sarah Lacy’s smug, self-congratulatory April 09 TechCrunch story that disses journalism schools and anyone majoring in journalism these days.

Here’s why we ought to be bullish on Journalism majors:

journalism11.  They’re optimists.  Feeling good about the future is the first step toward making it so.

2.  They’re self-reliant.  They realize there’s no ready-made career track waiting for them at the end of the diploma.  Their career will be one they carve out for themselves.

3.  They’re creative.  They’re putting themselves in a position where they have no choice but to be creative.  Some of the most creative people I know have used this strategy throughout their careers to grow and prosper.

4.  They’re following their fear.  Garrison Keillor, the writer and radio host, once told me that he built his career by “doing the thing that scared him most.”  Majoring in Journalism is a bold move in the face of a fearsome job market.  On the other side of your fear is potential you cannot discover until you do the thing that scares you.

5.  They’re entrepreneurial.   An entrepreneur sees opportunity where others do not.  Something in these Journalism majors relishes the wave of negative news coming from the marketplace, because it means they can position themselves at the bottom of the market to ride it up.

Educators at the University level, many of them celebrated veterans of old school journalism, share their students’ appetite for the unknown:

Overholser1Kevin Klose, Dean of the University of Maryland Journalism School, admits he doesn’t know where people will get their news in coming years. “It’s like the early days of radio,” he says. “There was a tremendous amount of feverish invention, trial and error that went on in the 1920s and 1930s.  The outlets or platforms are unclear now — they’re being invented.”

Klose describes himself as a “participant in an ongoing experiment” to find formats for independent journalism.

Geneva Overholser, a Pulitizer Prize-winning editor and journalist, who today is director of the School of Journalism at USC, says, “We seem to feel the only way we can work is to work the way we’ve always done it.  That’s just not true. We will ride these yearnings for the past right down the tube.”   She sees her work as an exploration that will lead to “a reinvention of journalism that is richer and better than the old.”

Roker1Raymond Roker, founder and publisher of URB, a print and online publication dedicated to hip-hop and urban culture, believes that the calling of journalism is the one constant in a changing business environment.  “The allure,” he tweeted in a 137-character response to my question, “is wht it’s always bn–regardless of the dramatic changes in the economy of media–to develop, explore & lead the conversation.”

Roker tweet #2:  “The quality of our journalism, in whatever form it takes in a post-print world, will remain a barometer of how informed we are as a society.”

Any brand would be wise to include journalism majors in its conversations about What’s Next and Whom to Hire.  There are lot of reasons why these students, in particular, will be productive players in the changing game.

GameChanger of the Month, February 2008

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

When I began my career in the media business, it was accepted as doctrine that if you had a mainstream news story, the New York Times or one of the big Manhattan-based publications led, and everyone else followed. This began changing with the advent of the Networked World, until it seemed that no one was leading and everyone was following, that the news came from everywhere, all at once. (A classic improv saying goes: “Follow the follower.”) No one understood these new realities better and faster than Matt Drudge.

Drudge1

After Drudge (’Web A. D.’ ) the constellation that was American newspaper journalism, shook, shifted and re-aligned, with Himself as one of its stars, and other web sites like the Huffington Post, Politico and Gawker joining the Drudge Report as new centers of gravity. (more…)