Prompted by a question from a friend of ours, GameChangers conducted a flash survey to identify the metaphors used most frequently in business communication. The results are no surprise:
Our methodology was to ask six exceptional communicators who work with all sizes of organizations in a lot of different verticals what metaphors they hear most often in their business scenes. Those surveyed included a financial analyst, an academic, an artist, a social media director for a large tech company, a brand strategist and someone I’d describe as a ‘narratologist,’ who coaches organizations on storytelling. We limited the focus of the survey to internal communication for two reasons:
1) External communication like PR, advertising and social media, is how companies represent themselves to the rest of the world. In this context, metaphors are frequently used as a means of persuasion, and are often more about what a company or brand wants to happen than what is actually happening. Because these metaphors serve a different purpose and have a different trajectory, they have to be analyzed separately.
2) Internal communication, by comparison, describes a company’s process, environment and character. The metaphors used internally reflect reality, because they are used to initiate or define action. For this reason they often represent an underlying ethos, and describe how the people in an organization go about their business.
A few of the respondents’ observations:
“Maybe this would change with a few female managers, but most men I work with are all about ‘playing offense’, ‘launching a counterattack’, ‘leading from the front’, and ‘winning the battle but losing the war’.”
“Way heavier on war references or warlike verbs: Insert, manage, acquire, degrade, demand, battle, launch, attack, defend…”
“I also wonder as more women get into biz if the primary metaphors change. Meaning, less sports and war, more family and home metaphors? Especially if this whole social thing works out? (tongue firmly in cheek)”
“Think of the top headlines, of any ‘this product is killing this product’, ‘death of X’, etc.”
“Sports also present…anything that’s zero sum and can be ‘won’ lends itself.”
“I also hear (more recently) about scientific references like ‘if you observe it, you change it’.”
‘I do hear a bit about chess and board games, typically in terms of ‘looking at the whole board’, ’sacrificing your queen’, and ‘thinking through the endgame’.
The business opportunity is clear. Over two-thirds of all business communication relies on only two metaphors—war and sports. Not only have we worn them out, they do not address the voracious appetite of a networked business environment for fresh narratives and new ways of relating to the world. To do that, we need fresh metaphors. They are out there in the world, and in abundance. Games are beginning to have their day. And there have always been organizations that see themselves as Family. The most upside, I believe, lies in the ‘Other’ category. Big, expressive, thematically rich subjects—music and dance, cooking, biology, quantum mechanics, farming, to name a few—can invigorate your organizational vocabulary. They help transform your narrative from the mundane and predictable to the artful and unexpected. And that’s what you want in a story, any story. So start planting, and see what grows!
(A coda to this post in light of what happened yesterday in Arizona, when a mentally disturbed gunman killed six people during his attempt to assassinate Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords: The metaphors of war—and the violence they glorify—have polarized the U.S. politically to a dangerous degree. Yesterday’s events add a raw and desperate urgency to the quest for new ways of seeing and engaging with one another. The metaphors of war attract fear-driven fringe characters looking for absolutes, either-ors, and final solutions, to the problems confronting us. To these people, nothing says final like the end of a gun barrel. The narratives of war trample on the tender shoots of new ideas, and marginalize people participating in the new narratives, people like Congresswoman Giffords, who champion peaceful co-existence, believe in yes-and, and who understand that yesterday’s solutions don’t work in today’s world.)
