<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heather Champ, Improviser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/553/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/553</link>
	<description>Improvisation for Business in the Networked World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:13:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MerryHooYa</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/553/comment-page-1#comment-21568</link>
		<dc:creator>MerryHooYa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=553#comment-21568</guid>
		<description>I can tell you this, working with Champ means love is definitely not a constant. Not even close. I regard her as a phony hold-over from the dumb days (1999-2005) and I feel the same about Derek. Never have a seen two people so tirelessly self-promote and fiddle with tools to make sure they rank high in searches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can tell you this, working with Champ means love is definitely not a constant. Not even close. I regard her as a phony hold-over from the dumb days (1999-2005) and I feel the same about Derek. Never have a seen two people so tirelessly self-promote and fiddle with tools to make sure they rank high in searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content is cheap, context is expensive: Is it any surprise which one we lack? &#124; Unstructured Thoughts by Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/553/comment-page-1#comment-2705</link>
		<dc:creator>Content is cheap, context is expensive: Is it any surprise which one we lack? &#124; Unstructured Thoughts by Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=553#comment-2705</guid>
		<description>[...] How are we going to empower people to shine through companies? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How are we going to empower people to shine through companies? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/553/comment-page-1#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=553#comment-647</guid>
		<description>I think the potential that non U.S. companies have that many U.S. companies currently do not is their employees&#039; ability to set aside ego and personal ambition to recognize and champion the essential values upon which the brand is built.  The &#039;power of personalization&#039; is only as good as the talent of the people using the tools of personalization.  A Disney employee blog about baseball statistics, for example, would not be as in-tune with the brand as a blog about baseball as a family pastime.  A personal brand is only as good as its ability to harmonize with another brand.  When it comes to business, this often means the brand of one&#039;s employers.

It is simply not enough to toot one&#039;s own horn.  One must have a sense of how the toot jibes with the whistle, plunk and boom of other players to make the music that is a company or organizational brand.  

We have a star/soloist mentality in the U.S.  This can quickly turn into cacophony.  Non U.S. companies, in my experience,  tend to be more oriented to the ensemble/orchestra.  This is a much more effective way of collaborating, creating harmony, and being productive in one&#039;s business  scenes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the potential that non U.S. companies have that many U.S. companies currently do not is their employees&#8217; ability to set aside ego and personal ambition to recognize and champion the essential values upon which the brand is built.  The &#8216;power of personalization&#8217; is only as good as the talent of the people using the tools of personalization.  A Disney employee blog about baseball statistics, for example, would not be as in-tune with the brand as a blog about baseball as a family pastime.  A personal brand is only as good as its ability to harmonize with another brand.  When it comes to business, this often means the brand of one&#8217;s employers.</p>
<p>It is simply not enough to toot one&#8217;s own horn.  One must have a sense of how the toot jibes with the whistle, plunk and boom of other players to make the music that is a company or organizational brand.  </p>
<p>We have a star/soloist mentality in the U.S.  This can quickly turn into cacophony.  Non U.S. companies, in my experience,  tend to be more oriented to the ensemble/orchestra.  This is a much more effective way of collaborating, creating harmony, and being productive in one&#8217;s business  scenes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/553/comment-page-1#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=553#comment-627</guid>
		<description>I loved this article, and liked your take on it.  Finding ways to &quot;personalize the company&quot; and let people shine through directly to fans and customers is the biggest challenge and opportunity for traditional companies.

US business regulations and culture seem to be more bound by &quot;letter of the law&quot; rather than the more improv &quot;intent of the law&quot; found in the UK and other business systems.  Perhaps non-US companies will be able to take the power of personalization and improv to heart faster than US companies?  I&#039;m curious what you think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved this article, and liked your take on it.  Finding ways to &#8220;personalize the company&#8221; and let people shine through directly to fans and customers is the biggest challenge and opportunity for traditional companies.</p>
<p>US business regulations and culture seem to be more bound by &#8220;letter of the law&#8221; rather than the more improv &#8220;intent of the law&#8221; found in the UK and other business systems.  Perhaps non-US companies will be able to take the power of personalization and improv to heart faster than US companies?  I&#8217;m curious what you think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
