<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/510/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/510</link>
	<description>Improvisation for Business in the Networked World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:09:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/510/comment-page-1#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=510#comment-271</guid>
		<description>@ Ethan you mean a &quot;sugar daddy&quot;? :)

Didn&#039;t mean to hijack the thread... this example is an interesting analogue to how venture capitalists and entrepreneurs create businesses to take on risks, and I think this is the main reason I found the example interesting.

Being an entrepreneur, taking risks on new ventures, et. al. is nothing new: what could be new is finding new people and ways fund entrepreneurship...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ethan you mean a &#8220;sugar daddy&#8221;? <img src='http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t mean to hijack the thread&#8230; this example is an interesting analogue to how venture capitalists and entrepreneurs create businesses to take on risks, and I think this is the main reason I found the example interesting.</p>
<p>Being an entrepreneur, taking risks on new ventures, et. al. is nothing new: what could be new is finding new people and ways fund entrepreneurship&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Bauley</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/510/comment-page-1#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Bauley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=510#comment-270</guid>
		<description>LOL

For the record, I don&#039;t consider my nearly-29-year-old self part of &quot;Gen Y&quot;.

Anyways, Thomas Jefferson and I are working up some cloud computing initiatives that are going to be huge.

He really &quot;gets&quot; social media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL</p>
<p>For the record, I don&#8217;t consider my nearly-29-year-old self part of &#8220;Gen Y&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyways, Thomas Jefferson and I are working up some cloud computing initiatives that are going to be huge.</p>
<p>He really &#8220;gets&#8221; social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/510/comment-page-1#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=510#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Yeah, or you could get some dead people to front for you, and then you&#039;d REALLY be cookin.

; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, or you could get some dead people to front for you, and then you&#8217;d REALLY be cookin.</p>
<p>; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Bauley</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/510/comment-page-1#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Bauley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=510#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Nice comment thread you got going here...

I&#039;d venture a guess that the $350k pitch investment was also covered somewhat by the production company; since Cordner et al have the expertise/connections to get in the room, the production company provides investment capital.

Taylor: maybe the &quot;new entrepreneurialism&quot;/funding model we&#039;re thinking of isn&#039;t about &quot;Gen Y&quot; at all...it&#039;s about old people like Mike B. and Cordner that can *make things happen* without so much risk/inexperience.

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice comment thread you got going here&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d venture a guess that the $350k pitch investment was also covered somewhat by the production company; since Cordner et al have the expertise/connections to get in the room, the production company provides investment capital.</p>
<p>Taylor: maybe the &#8220;new entrepreneurialism&#8221;/funding model we&#8217;re thinking of isn&#8217;t about &#8220;Gen Y&#8221; at all&#8230;it&#8217;s about old people like Mike B. and Cordner that can *make things happen* without so much risk/inexperience.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/510/comment-page-1#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=510#comment-267</guid>
		<description>- Interesting that they were able to recruit 15-20 people before landing the account, although I&#039;m guessing that it was not too big of a career bet by the 15-20 people given Traffic&#039;s co-founders reputation and success (and the $12 M Toyota account)

- Why is only a % of the $350-500K out-of-pocket?  I apologize, but I&#039;m not knowledgeable about the ad account competition process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Interesting that they were able to recruit 15-20 people before landing the account, although I&#8217;m guessing that it was not too big of a career bet by the 15-20 people given Traffic&#8217;s co-founders reputation and success (and the $12 M Toyota account)</p>
<p>- Why is only a % of the $350-500K out-of-pocket?  I apologize, but I&#8217;m not knowledgeable about the ad account competition process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/510/comment-page-1#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=510#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Taylor. 

I&#039;ll get the &#039;official&#039; answers from Traffic and (re)post them, but here are my guesstimates: 

- The pitch team was recruited in the 2-3 months leading up to the pitch, consisted of 15-20 people.  The agency will eventually size up to 120- 130 people.

- Bets were made when Traffic was formed for the purpose of winning Mitsubishi.  Q4 2007.

- It typically costs $350-500K to compete for an auto account.  This was probably the range of Traffic&#039;s investment, though only a percentage of that was out of pocket costs.

- Downside was the bet.  It was hedged by a $12 mil Toyota strategy account Cordner and Powers had already landed (status in the wake of winning the Mitsu acct TBD).  It was also hedged by the fact that Cimarron could absorb significant production costs as overhead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Taylor. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll get the &#8216;official&#8217; answers from Traffic and (re)post them, but here are my guesstimates: </p>
<p>- The pitch team was recruited in the 2-3 months leading up to the pitch, consisted of 15-20 people.  The agency will eventually size up to 120- 130 people.</p>
<p>- Bets were made when Traffic was formed for the purpose of winning Mitsubishi.  Q4 2007.</p>
<p>- It typically costs $350-500K to compete for an auto account.  This was probably the range of Traffic&#8217;s investment, though only a percentage of that was out of pocket costs.</p>
<p>- Downside was the bet.  It was hedged by a $12 mil Toyota strategy account Cordner and Powers had already landed (status in the wake of winning the Mitsu acct TBD).  It was also hedged by the fact that Cimarron could absorb significant production costs as overhead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/510/comment-page-1#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=510#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Excellent example of being able to create a company to serve an exact need by a specific company.  

I am curious when the agency acquired and recruited the necessary talent: before or after landing Mitsbubishi?  When did Traffic&#039;s founders make their bets, and how large were their bets?  What was their downside if they failed to land Mitsubishi?

(btw, I love the blog, Ethan Bauley pointed you out to me...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent example of being able to create a company to serve an exact need by a specific company.  </p>
<p>I am curious when the agency acquired and recruited the necessary talent: before or after landing Mitsbubishi?  When did Traffic&#8217;s founders make their bets, and how large were their bets?  What was their downside if they failed to land Mitsubishi?</p>
<p>(btw, I love the blog, Ethan Bauley pointed you out to me&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

