Narratologists, as the name implies, obsess over narrative. What makes a good story (and a story good)? What are the emotional stakes? What’s the relationship between characters? Between text and subtext? Who are the players? What roles to they play, and do these roles reveal or conceal their true natures? What motivates them? What needs to they seek to fulfill? How does narrative create dialogue between players and audience? These are the questions keeping Narratologists awake at night, and earning their keep during the day.
Platformists obsess over apps. How solid is an app? How does it scale? What language is it written in (and how many does it speak)? Who uses it and why? What is the feature set? What is the ROI? What is the social component? How compatible is it? What’s the relationship between reliability and flexibility? What differentiates it from its competitors? If you can answer these questions for more than five apps, you’ve got a lot of Platformist in you.
Narratologists and Platformists can collaborate with one another, but one cannot be both. Not at the same time anyway. We all have to choose. To help with your decision-making, here are a few things to consider:
Narratives are designed to make sense of the world by distilling information into meaning. Most platforms are, by contrast, designed to distribute information. ”Information,” Viola Spolin once said, “is a poor form of communication.” Choose.
Narrative is inherently more unique, and therefore scarcer and ultimately more valuable than any platform. As information gets commoditized across platforms–33.5 billion tweets about brands in 2009 (Forrester), 120 million videos hosted on YouTube with an average of 200,000 more added every day (Yahoo Answers), and 400+ million profiles on Facebook (Business Week)–using narrative as a way of organizing and extracting meaning from information grows more relevant all the time. Would you rather wrestle with one meaningful narrative, or 33.5 billion mostly meaningless tweets? Call it while it’s in the air.
Narratologists deal in the relationships between people. Narrative wants to be human. Wants to engage. Wants to move its audience. Yes, it can be messy and unpredictable, but that’s life.
Platforms, on the other hand, deal in the relationships between people and technology. Platforming may be more predictable, but it’s antiseptic. It wants to be germ-free. That’s not life. ‘Sterile’ is most likely not an association you want for your brand.
Maybe what matters most is that narratives are a lot more fun for participants. They generate energy and emotion, manifest purpose, offer possibilities. They elevate their audience from the drone of daily life.
Platforms, from the days of Gutenberg’s first printing press, have always been and will always be a pain in the ass. They spawn frustration and induce headeaches. We find ourselves chained to them. It’s the nature of the beast.
Would you rather entertain the possibility of having fun, or guarantee yourself a certain amount of frustration? Are you a ‘glass-is-half-full-drink-up’ kind of person, or a ‘this-glass-will-automatically-notify-me-via-SMS-when-its-fill-factor-is-above-50%’ kind of person? You can only drink from one glass at a time.
Narratives define what platforms cannot. Narratives last longer than platforms. Mean more. Engage more deeply. Evolve more quickly. Earn more money in the long haul.
Choose.
Tags: Dialogue, Flexibility, Narrative, Narratologist, Narratology, Platform, Platformist, Players, Social Media, story, Technology, Ultimate Organizing Principle
I’m unemployed – which category does that fall into? – LOL
Bravo Mike! Bravo. Great post. Soooo on the money I’m willing to buy a lottery ticket on it. A little something on the same lines. . . http://www.cnvrgnc.com/journal-old/2010/3/7/mmmm-sexy.html
Can a platform power narratives, or provide the spaces for narratives to flourish? Why must the two be completely separate?
TD: Platforms are ABSOLUTELY essential for narratives to flourish. In fact, it’s the proliferation of network/cloud platforms that are liberating narratives and allowing their shape (more accurately our ability to perceive their shape) to change. From scripted to improvised. From Newtonian to Quantum. From owned to shared.
So the two are not separate, any more than the observed and the observer of any phenomenon are separate. One inexorably impacts the other. My contention here is that platform should serve the narrative, and not the other way around.
In general, the platformist leads with ‘What’s your strategy?’ and turns the answer into a story that supports the strategy. The narratologist leads with “What’s your story?” and turns the answer into a strategy that supports the story.
[...] Stories are the best way we have of simplifying complexity, of finding common ground. They provide the context that no technology or platform can. In a complex system, context owns. Because business gets conducted in an environment that’s exponentially more complex today than it was yesterday, story has never been more important. But like everyone else does, we have to go about our work differently. We’re not just storytellers, we’re experts in the science of narrative. [...]
[...] is powerful stuff and should be chosen with great care. At GameChangers, we practice what I call the science of narrative. This science requires specific, deliberate and objective choices about what metaphors we put into [...]