<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mix Mills and Grain Bins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/1447/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/1447</link>
	<description>Improvisation for Business in the Networked World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:09:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/1447/comment-page-1#comment-24771</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=1447#comment-24771</guid>
		<description>I agree that neither the &#039;why&#039; nor the &#039;what&#039; has to address, quantify, or set expectations for the outcome.  I don&#039;t think of it in terms of goal-setting which, you&#039;re right, is a big trap in the networked environment, bc there are so many positive outcomes possible.  Instead, I frame these questions in terms of motivation.  I don&#039;t know too many small farmers, for example, who have stated business goals beyond figuring out a way to survive from one spring to the next.  But the &#039;whys&#039; of the small farmer are almost always expressed clearly, if not verbally.  It is who they are.  They love living close to the land.  They feel there&#039;s no better way to raise a family.  Their values are aligned with their work, maybe that&#039;s the biggest &#039;why&#039; of all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that neither the &#8216;why&#8217; nor the &#8216;what&#8217; has to address, quantify, or set expectations for the outcome.  I don&#8217;t think of it in terms of goal-setting which, you&#8217;re right, is a big trap in the networked environment, bc there are so many positive outcomes possible.  Instead, I frame these questions in terms of motivation.  I don&#8217;t know too many small farmers, for example, who have stated business goals beyond figuring out a way to survive from one spring to the next.  But the &#8216;whys&#8217; of the small farmer are almost always expressed clearly, if not verbally.  It is who they are.  They love living close to the land.  They feel there&#8217;s no better way to raise a family.  Their values are aligned with their work, maybe that&#8217;s the biggest &#8216;why&#8217; of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/archives/1447/comment-page-1#comment-24770</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamechangers.com/index.html/?p=1447#comment-24770</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Spot on.

IMP&#039;s are, once again, paving the way as we discover new frameworks for content creation/distribution/consumption/collaboration. The tools available to IMP&#039;s today are a key factor in why we&#039;ve found ourselves in this current state of furious creativity and collaboration.

As to the &quot;what&quot; and &quot;why&quot; of IMP creation, it&#039;s good to remember that not every new endeavor needs to have a clear-cut end goal. Artists are often compelled to create, and that compulsion doesn&#039;t always have a detailed plan. Even when it does, the original goal isn&#039;t always where you end up.

The act of creation often generates unexpected benefits and value beyond the original goal and vision.

IMP&#039;s should pack their toolbox appropriately, they should ask what they&#039;re planting, and they should even pose the question of why. But they should not let their answers - or lack of answers - stop them from following their creative instincts.

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Spot on.</p>
<p>IMP&#8217;s are, once again, paving the way as we discover new frameworks for content creation/distribution/consumption/collaboration. The tools available to IMP&#8217;s today are a key factor in why we&#8217;ve found ourselves in this current state of furious creativity and collaboration.</p>
<p>As to the &#8220;what&#8221; and &#8220;why&#8221; of IMP creation, it&#8217;s good to remember that not every new endeavor needs to have a clear-cut end goal. Artists are often compelled to create, and that compulsion doesn&#8217;t always have a detailed plan. Even when it does, the original goal isn&#8217;t always where you end up.</p>
<p>The act of creation often generates unexpected benefits and value beyond the original goal and vision.</p>
<p>IMP&#8217;s should pack their toolbox appropriately, they should ask what they&#8217;re planting, and they should even pose the question of why. But they should not let their answers &#8211; or lack of answers &#8211; stop them from following their creative instincts.</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

